How are disputes between chiropractors resolved?

Disputes between chiropractors are typically resolved through mediation or arbitration because these methods provide a structured yet informal environment to facilitate resolution without resorting to lengthy and costly litigation. Mediation involves a neutral third party who helps the conflicting parties communicate and negotiate a mutually acceptable solution, while arbitration involves a third party who reviews the case and makes a binding decision based on the evidence presented. These approaches are often preferred in the chiropractic field due to their collaborative nature, which encourages preserving professional relationships and can lead to quicker resolutions compared to traditional court proceedings.

Litigation, while an option, is usually seen as a last resort due to its adversarial nature and the significant time and financial resources it often requires. Public hearings are more common in regulatory or licensing disputes rather than personal conflicts between practitioners. Mutual agreement to stop practicing would not effectively resolve the dispute itself and could leave underlying issues unaddressed. Thus, mediation or arbitration stands out as the most effective and appropriate means of resolving disputes among chiropractors.