Which ethical principle requires a chiropractor to do no harm to patients?

The principle that requires a chiropractor to do no harm to patients is non-maleficence. This ethical principle is foundational in healthcare and places a strong emphasis on ensuring that practitioners avoid causing harm to those they serve. It underscores the importance of risk management in chiropractic practice, compelling chiropractors to consider the potential adverse effects of their treatments. Non-maleficence embodies the commitment to patient safety and promotes a careful assessment of treatment options, aiming to prevent any harm that could arise from either action or inaction in the course of care.

In contrast, beneficence focuses on acting in the best interest of the patient and promoting good health outcomes. Justice deals with fairness and equality in the distribution of healthcare resources and treatment. Autonomy emphasizes the patient's right to make informed decisions about their care. While these principles are all integral to ethical practice, non-maleficence specifically highlights the obligation to refrain from causing harm, making it the correct answer to this question.